A
Lagos State High Court in Ikeja on Friday affirmed the witness summons
issued on the Founder of Synagogue Church of All Nations (SCOAN),
Prophet T.B. Joshua, to appear before the Coroner probing the cause of
death of the 116 persons in the church’s collapsed building on September
12, 2014.
The presiding judge, Justice Lateefa Okunnu, also
held that the Coroner, Magistrate O.A. Komolafe, had the power to
inquire into the cause of the building collapse in his mandate to
determine the direct cause and manner of the victims’ death.
The
Judge further held that the allegation of bias levelled against
Komolafe by T.B. Joshua in the conduct of the inquest was
unsubstantiated as the proof that T.B. Joshua adduced were mere
conjectures which lacked any evidential weight.
“Having read the
transcripts from the proceedings, I regret that I do not share the
applicants’ point of view that the respondent had been biased or unfair
and had breached the principle of natural justice,” Okunnu held.
The
Judge also struck out the Coroner’s court as a respondent in the suit,
on the grounds that it was not a juristic person that could be sued.
Following
the collapse of the SCOAN’s six-storey guest house on September 12,
last year, killing about 116 persons and injuring many, the Lagos State
Government had set up the Coroner’s inquest to determine the cause of
death and the circumstances leading to the mishap.
But weeks
into the Coroner’s inquest, which began on October 13, 2014, T.B. Joshua
had approached Okunnu asking for a judicial review of the Coroner’s
proceedings.
In the said application, the prophet asked Okunnu
to determine whether the witness summons served on him to appear and
testify before the Coroner was not a breach of his right to fair hearing
when no material fact had been placed against him before the Coroner.
He
also asked the Judge to determine whether it was not beyond the power
of the Coroner to venture into the possible cause of the building
collapse.
T.B. Joshua also alleged that the Coroner had shown
bias against him, arguing that the Coroner compromised his neutrality
and demonstrated personal interest at the point when he threatened to
order Joshua’s arrest for failure to honour the witness summons.
T.B.
Joshua’s lawyers, Lateef Fagbemi (SAN) and Olalekan Ojo, also contended
that the duty of the Coroner did not go beyond ascertaining the reason
for the victims’ death.
According to them, it was beyond the
Coroner to enquire into the possible reason why the building, wherein
the victims perished, collapsed in terms of building approval and the
quality of materials used in the construction.
They, therefore,
urged the court to stop the Coroner from further extending his
inquisitions into areas beyond his statutory scope.
They further
asked the court to pronounce as null and void, all previous proceedings
already conducted by the magistrate in excess of jurisdiction.
But Okunnu, on Friday, resolved all the issues raised in favour of the Coroner.
The
Judge held that it was up to the Coroner to determine what types of
material evidence and witnesses that would be relevant to his findings,
adding that he had unlimited power to summon anyone in the execution of
his duty.
“It is the Coroner himself that largely hunts for the
evidence that he considers to be useful to him,” Okunnu held, adding
that the Coroner “is a master of his own proceedings.”
The Judge
added that by virtue of Section 26 and 27 of the Coroner System Laws of
Lagos State, 2007, the Coroner was empowered to compel the attendance
of any witness he considered to be useful to his inquisitions, including
Joshua.
She held, “The Coroner has the prerogative of calling
witnesses who he believes would be of assistance to his fact-finding
mission.”
In the final analysis, the Judge adjudged Joshua’s application to be lacking in merit and consequently dismissed it.
Meanwhile,
a Structural Engineer and Consultant to the Lagos State Material
Testing Agency, Saheed Ariyori, on Friday told the Coroner that his
examination revealed that there were no signs of stress on the building
prior to its collapse.
The witness, who had earlier asserted
that faulty or inadequate foundation was responsible for the collapse,
however, admitted that he was not a professional in the field of
sub-soil investigation, adding that there was an error of calculation in
the report he tendered before the Coroner.
Further hearing in the inquest has been adjourned till March 12, 2015.
Credit: Channels
No comments:
Post a Comment