Nigeria
has a date with destiny as March 28 and April 11 draw near. These are
two significant dates that, on the one hand, present Nigerians with an
opportunity to strengthen democracy through the ballot.
These
dates, on the other hand, are also beaming scaring danger signals. No
thanks to politicians who are beating drums of war, stumping across the
country, making campaign statements full of fury, with little about
issues of concern to most Nigerians. As is typical of Nigerian
elections, the tension is thick in the air, so much so that the putrid
smell of Armageddon has enveloped the country. Fears are palpable,
generating serious concerns among Nigerians and within the international
community.
Nigeria has travelled this route
before, not once. There are however reasons for genuine and heightened
concern this time. The last few years have seen widening cracks along
the country’s well-known fault lines of religion and ethnicity. The
security situation, especially in the North-East, has been a huge sore
on the reputation of Africa’s most populous country. The abduction of
more than 200 girls from the Borno community of Chibok nearly one year
ago, and the perceived lack of enough effort from the government of
President Goodluck Jonathan to ensure they are rescued, are making the
prospect of a peaceful poll a tall dream.
President Jonathan has
had to take the blame for virtually everything going wrong in Nigeria.
Admittedly, there are issues that currently feed this perception. They
include the security situation, corruption and poor living standards of
most Nigerians. Ordinarily, the buck stops at the desk of the President.
The opposition seems to have succeeded in creating the impression that
Jonathan merely wakes up on a daily basis and does nothing. But things
don’t always seem as they look in Nigeria.
That the President
has been doing nothing would not pass the muster of non-partisan
scrutiny. What would be correct is that the President has actually done
little to publicise the many things he has been doing. In the last six
years, the government has been confronting more fundamental issues of
growth and development with the type of vigour and single-mindedness
uncommon in Nigeria.
The Jonathan administration would trump any
previous administration in the effort made to tackle the near-complete
collapse of infrastructure such as roads, transport and power supply.
The same can be said of employment generation and capacity development.
Nigeria’s economy has not only survived major shake-ups affecting most
advanced economies, it has actually also been growing in leaps and
bounds, emerging as Africa’s largest.
He has perhaps taken an
ingenious route to fighting corruption. He understands the difference
between the symptoms of corruption and the underlying causes. While many
had expected a frontal attack at the symptoms through demonstrative —
even if unlawful — actions by deploying anti-corruption forces in a
frenzy of mass arrests, media trials and public sentencing of suspects,
the President has chosen to allow the justice system the space to work.
He
hasn’t stopped at that. He is, with the skill of a surgeon, identifying
the underlying causes of corruption and taking them out one after the
other. This is what he did with a fertiliser distribution scam, which
had hampered food production and diversification effort for decades.
Perhaps, he did not make enough noise on this, but the result of his
approach is loud enough for the thousands of Nigerian farmers who now
have easy access to fertiliser, completely eliminating the meddlesome
middlemen. The action is equally loud enough for the vested interests to
fight back and join the now-profitable President-bashing choir.
The
security challenge is a bit more complicated. Jonathan’s emergence
represented a paradigm shift in the Nigerian political arrangement. He
was the first person with no strong political background or affiliation,
and from a minority tribe to become a democratic president in Nigeria.
He had not benefited from any of the important pillars of power such as
the support of a major ethnic group. The template for success in the
Nigerian environment requires much more than the timing of response to a
security situation, such as the Chibok abduction saga. It requires the
willingness of the players within the affected area to put the safety of
lives and protection of properties of the people ahead of their own
immediate political advantage. It is not going to be easy trimming the
hair of someone who continues to run. It could take time to either catch
up with him or get him to willingly agree to the need to solve a
problem. The ability to keep calm rather than adopt a knee-jerk and
high-handed approach in the face of treachery and impunity is a great
asset the President is endowed with. This, as the opposition is wont to
do, can also be mistaken for weakness or incompetence.
Jonathan’s
civilised approach to tackling issues is built around the need to
ensure social justice, equity and the rule of law. This should,
ordinarily, be worthy of global acknowledgement and commendation. But
the concerted noise from the opposition camp and the penchant of some
international observers to rush to judgment without taking full account
of peculiarities of an environment are a bit deafening and blinding to
the reality on the ground.
As elections are getting closer, the
President is faced with the facts that Nigerians are in a hurry. They’ve
waited for too long. This is a situation that is being exploited by
opposition leaders, who have been calling for mob actions as against the
rule of law. Besides, he has equally shown that he understands that
Nigerians are expecting a leader with a magic wand, who could with a
snap somewhere, turn age-long and deeply rooted social decay into an
instant state of bliss. But the magic wand could actually be a
possibility if current efforts are allowed another four years to take
root, grow and bear fruits.
No comments:
Post a Comment