In
Nigeria, the office of the Chairman, Independent National Electoral
Commission is the most challenging after the office of the President of
the Federal Republic of Nigeria. It has been like that right from the
first indigenous occupant of the office since 1960. Apart from the fact
that the office is challenging, it is also a thankless job. Only a few
occupants have left that office with their reputation intact. Which
explains my pity for Prof. Attahiru Jega, the present INEC chairman.
Nigeria
has so far produced 11 chairmen of electoral commissions at the centre.
Generally, they have been men of timber and calibre who reached the
peak of their individual careers before their appointment as the
nation’s electoral umpires. Some were jurists; others are first class
civil servants while some are top academics. Before the current
chairman, not less than seven professors had held the office. However,
by the time they were leaving, most of them had lost their reputation.
They often ended up with their reputation dented.
The
first indigenous electoral body in Nigeria was led by Eyo Ita Esua from
1960 to1966. He organised the first post-independence federal and
regional elections of 1964 and 1965. The elections were marred with
disputes and irregularities which culminated into the military coup of
1966. The coup terminated the tenure of Esua and the civilian
administration of Prime Minister Abubakar Tafawa Balewa.
The
electoral commission chairmen after Esua and before Jega are Michael Ani
1976; Ovie Whiskey 1983; Eme Awa 1988; Humphrey Nwosu 1989; Okon Uya
1993; Dagogo Jack 1984; Ephraim Apata 1999; Abel Goubadia 2000 and
Maurice Iwu 2005. At the time they were leaving office, almost all of
these eminent Nigerians had their reputation dented.
Dr Goodluck
Jonathan who became the President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria in
2007 appointed Prof Jega as the INEC chairman as a replacement to Prof.
Iwu. Born in Jega, Kebbi State on January 11, 1957, Jega attended
Bayero University Kano and graduated in 1978 with a B. Sc degree in
Political Science. He later became the Vice-Chancellor of the same
university on September 6, 2004. In June 2010, he was appointed INEC
chairman. However, his most renowned service position was as the
President of the Academic Staff Union of Universities from 1988 to 1994.
Jega’s first outing as INEC chairman was his conduct of the
general election in 2011. The major contestants to the office of the
President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria then were the same
contestants in this year’s election. The elections of 2011 were reported
in the international media as having run smoothly with relatively
little violence or voter fraud in contrast to previous elections. The US
State Department said the elections were successful and a substantial
improvement over 2007. This no doubt was positive comments on Jega’s
INEC. The electoral body has also performed creditably well in the
governorship elections in Ekiti and Osun states. In fact, the US
congratulated INEC and other stakeholders in the June 21, 2014
governorship election in Ekiti which it adjudged to be credible.
Although it should be realised that to conduct election in just one
state and only for a single office is a lot easier than the general
elections.
The true test of Jega’s INEC is the forthcoming
elections. The stakes are higher and the international community is
watching. Will Jega go the way of his predecessors or will he etch his
name in gold? Time will tell. However, there are doubts by some
Nigerians on INEC’s readiness to conduct successful elections judging by
its poor handling of the distribution of the Permanent Voter Cards.
There are reports also of non-release of adequate funds to INEC by the
government. Other issues that might affect INEC’s successful outing
include logistics, remuneration of electoral officials and ad hoc staff.
The issue of early arrival of electoral materials to various states,
local governments and polling units are also some of the challenges.
One
other serious issue that needs to be pointed out at this time is the
activities of disruptive elements in the society. INEC and all
stakeholders must be vigilant to confront these forces capable of
scuttling the 2015 elections. It was the same disruptive forces that
were instrumental to the annulment of the June 12 election when on the
eve of the presidential poll, a dubious injunction was secured from an
Abuja High Court restraining the National Electoral Commission from
conducting the election. The recent calls in some quarters for the
postponement of the 2015 elections and suggestion for the formation of
an Interim National Government are capable of creating a constitutional
crisis that could truncate the forthcoming elections and derail
Nigeria’s democracy which is now beginning to attract international
commendation particularly after the success of the Ekiti State election.
Nigerians must be vigilant and be prepared to resist any attempt to
scuttle the electoral process and abort Nigeria’s democracy.
However,
on the issue of elections in the three states of Adamawa, Borno and
Yobe, it is obvious that elections would not hold in some areas where
insurgency exits. The best that could be done is to allow the security
forces to come out with the list of areas that they could possibly
guarantee adequate security for INEC to hold elections. The conduct of
elections could then be restricted to those areas.
In the case
of the Internally Displaced Persons in the North-East and other places
including Nasarawa and the FCT, INEC should make a special arrangement
in collaboration with the Nigeria Emergency Management Agency for these
IDPs to be part of the elections. It might be necessary to appoint a
Special IDP Electoral Commissioner to be in charge of the IDP voters all
over the country regardless of the electoral provisions on the matter.
This will free the hands of the INEC Resident Electoral Commissioners in
the states affected to concentrate only on their primary assignment
without being saddled with this unexpected and embarrassing situation.
On
a final note, it is heartwarming to see all the presidential candidates
in the forthcoming poll committing themselves to a peaceful election.
This is the first step and one in the right direction. The second step
for a peaceful election particularly post-election violence is for INEC
to conduct free, fair and transparent elections just like what happened
in Ekiti State. The Ekiti election was so transparent that the incumbent
governor had to accept defeat and congratulate the winner. There was no
post-election crisis by the people of Ekiti State because their votes
counted. The lesson here is that once INEC is able to conduct credible
polls, post-election violence will be a thing of the past. Professor
Attahiru Muhammadu Jega, the ball is in your court.
- Brig. Gen. Ojo (retd.) wrote in from Lokoja
No comments:
Post a Comment